On the whole, your balanced view of technology (SA Perspectives “Get Real,” 4/03) seems appropriate. However, when you suggest that to stop research is to give up trying to make the world a better place, you tend toward your own dangerous extreme. Far more often than not in our global culture, technology is used to “fix” a problem that is really just a symptom of a more fundamental systemic dysfunction. The very prevalance of technology tends to keep us in that pound-of-cure mindset without realizing it. Worse, due to the complexities of human and ecological systems, the fixes often have unintended negative consequences. Unfortunately, those consequences are usually met by the prevalent mindset with merely another technofix. Technology may provide useful tools, but it is simply not the ultimate answer to making the world a better place. For that, we require a paradigm shift into a systems- and complexity-science-based way of thinking.
To Scientific American, Re: Technological Fixes
Appreciate this post? Support us!
The people at Potluck want to spend as much of their time as possible creating offerings like the one on this page and pursuing related endeavors, all with the hope of fostering positive change in the world. If you appreciate and would like to support our work, we would truly appreciate a contribution. To make a donation securely via PayPal, credit card, or e-check, please click the button below:
Thanks for your support and encouragement!



0 Comments on “To Scientific American, Re: Technological Fixes”
Leave a Comment